![]() We know that it will be a member of the Checkbook class, but if we actually give it a name, the reader will think that’s something they are supposed to remember. For example, in all of our use-cases so far, there has been only a single checkbook. Quite often, we know we want to discuss an object, but don’t really care to give it a name. ![]() ![]() In UML, the general form for an object declaration isįor example, chkTrans:Transaction indicates that we have an object named “chkTrans” of type “Transaction”. If it seems confusing to use rectangles for both, there is a consistent way to tell them apart. Note that, unlike in the class relationship diagrams, the rectangles here denote individual objects, not classes. In general, objects are shown as rectangles. Human objects are often indicated by a stick figure.To help understand this, we’ll take this apart, one element at a time, looking at what each one shows us.Ī sequence diagram is composed of a number of columns, each headed by an object. Here is a sequence diagram for our “Score Essay” use-case. Sequence diagrams allow us to demonstrate that our model suffices to represent a use case by mapping the steps of the use-case into specific messages (function calls) from one object to another.Īlthough sequence diagrams can be used to illustrate any interesting collaborations (sequences of related messages) among our objects, we most often draw one sequence diagram for each use case.Our domain or analysis models view the world as objects that interact by exchanging messages. What operations are involved, and on which objects These diagrams attempt to show, for some specific use-case or some common interaction: The syntax for the text describing the object is similar to the attributes in the class diagrams.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |